- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).|
Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
This is a very hard debate because both Earthquakes and Volcanoes are very dangerous. If i had a choice as to live some place with volcanoes or earthquakes, I would pick the place with earthquake. I would pick a place with earthquakes because they don’t have the ability to melt your skin right off your bones. Volcanoes are way more dangerous than earthquakes. For example: they push out molten lava at very high speeds and they can also push out very dense smoke that could make your lungs collapse right on the spot. I would rather be smashed by a falling building than be burned alive by molten lava. You may even survive being almost crushed by falling debris in a earthquake. With volcanoes you have no chance of surviving being burned alive. I do not know what you would choose but for me, volcanoes are way more dangerous than earthquakes. http://www.uwiseismic.com/
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!