Weaver/Science is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
- Find a debate you care about.
- Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
- Earn points and become a thought leader!
To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.
Be Yourself
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Annagranttt
| Reward Points: | 3 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
| Arguments: | 3 |
| Debates: | 0 |
Joined:
I support Lexies idea. Buildings and other structures falling are dangerous.
i do agree with Kole, but you should provide evidence. Maybe when a certain earthquake or tsunami happened?
I believe earthquakes are more destructive than volcanoes. They can destroy up to 300 miles of land! In 1857, the 7.8 magnitude earthquake on the San Andreas Fault ruptured almost 220 miles from the fault. That's at least 2 miles per second! Earthquakes also cause other natural disasters to happen. Tsunamis for example. When the Earth's tectonic plates move past each other, they cause large earthquakes, which tilt, offset, or displace large areas of the ocean floor from a few kilometers. In 1960, a tsunami was generated by a magnitude 9.5 earthquake that had a rupture zone of over 1,000 km. Its waves were destructive not only in Chile, but also as far away as Hawaii, Japan and other places in the Pacific
About Me
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here
